Logo
Search
ARTICLES
PODCAST
TOPICS
RESOURCES
RECOMMENDATIONS
SIGN IN
SUBSCRIBE
Logo
  • Home
  • Posts
  • 🎙️ Are Innovators Distracted by AI?

🎙️ Are Innovators Distracted by AI?

Danny Nathan
Danny Nathan

Jul 16, 2026

2 min read

The Podcast

Why you should watch it ☝️

Celia Wanderley spent years thinking she was going to stay in academia. She had the passion for teaching, the research background, and a computer science degree from Brazil. Then she realized she needed to be closer to application than to theory, and she jumped. That was nearly 30 years ago, and the version of applied thinking she has developed since sits squarely at the intersection of AI, enterprise innovation, and the messy human challenge of actually getting organizations to change.

What I appreciated most about this conversation is how directly Celia pushes back on two ideas that quietly undermine a lot of innovation efforts. The first is that innovation and invention are the same thing. They are not, and the GPU is her example: a piece of hardware designed for video processing that turned out to be almost perfectly suited for machine learning. Nobody invented anything new. Someone just used something differently, and that unlocked one of the biggest technological shifts of our time. The second is that innovation thrives in chaos. In Celia's experience, the opposite is true. The organizations that actually sustain innovation are the ones that treat it as a disciplined process with defined outcomes, not a sandbox where anything goes.

The idea I keep coming back to is her point that psychological safety and discipline are not opposites. You need both, and the organizations that try to build one without the other tend to end up with either a culture that feels free but produces nothing, or a process that produces output but kills the curiosity that makes real breakthroughs possible. That is a harder balance to strike than most innovation frameworks admit.

Here’s a teaser…

Where to find Celia Wanderley 👇

Find Celia on Linkedin.

What You Missed on Sunday

Here’s what we covered in Sunday’s newsletter edition…

$5.8 Billion Spent. Zero Acquisitions.

Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have spent more than $5.8 billion since 2024 hiring the founders and top talent out of AI startups, without formally acquiring a single one of those companies. No merger. No antitrust review. Just an employment offer to the people who mattered and a licensing check to the shell they left behind.

The label everyone reaches for is consolidation. What's actually happening is closer to disassembly, and the way the money moves tells you exactly who a startup is built to protect.

Here’s what you’ll find:

  • This Week’s Article: $5.8 Billion Spent. Zero Acquisitions.Read It Now

Catch our previous podcast episode:

🎙️ The Weirdest Person in the Room is The Most Important Person

Aly Khalifa has 47 patents and a simple argument: sustainable design isn't expensive. You're just doing the wrong math.

Innovate, Disrupt, or Die • Danny Nathan

See the Rest of the Episodes Here

How did this edition land for you?

Remember: you can innovate, disrupt, or die! ☠️

Explore Our Resource Library
Discover New Newsletters
Apply to Be a Podcast Guest
Sponsor Innovate, Disrupt, or Die!

Keep Reading



STAY CONNECTED


topics

be a Podcast Guest

Download One-Sheet

Innovate, Disrupt, or Die is created by the team at

We work with ambitious enterprises and promising entrepreneurs to develop innovation strategies into new ventures, products, and technologies that generate transformational growth and longevity.

Innovate, Disrupt, or Die is created by the team at

Apollo 21 works with ambitious enterprises and promising entrepreneurs to develop and translate innovation strategies into new ventures, products, and technologies that generate transformational growth and longevity.


topics

be a Podcast Guest

Download One-Sheet

MEDIA KIT

STAY CONNECTED

© 2026 Apollo 21, LLC.
beehiivPowered by beehiiv