Here’s what we covered in Sunday’s edition…
Hello {{ FNAME | Innovator }}!
Last week we explored the RPV framework that determines whether your org is even capable of disruption. In today’s edition, we’ll build on the RPV framework to demonstrate how it can be used as a litmus test for whether your ideas should be spun out or held close to the vest.
Here’s what you’ll find:
This Week’s Article: Orgs Can't Disrupt Themselves (But they can own the entity that can disrupt them…)
Share This: Finding the Right Org Structure for Disruption; How do you know when to spin out an innovation vs. holding tight?
Case Study: How an e-commerce giant spun out a cloud computing business that took over the world.
Have you seen our new Resource Library?
Our Resource Library is live. Check it out now for access to our highly trained, innovation-focused custom GPT, our New Venture Assessment GPT, and our collection of FREE white papers to help bolster your innovation, disruption, and venture-building efforts.
Why you should read it ☝️
Too many corporate innovation teams try to build startups without truly embracing the mindset, structure, and risk tolerance that make startups succeed. This article explores why large companies struggle to innovate like startups and how adopting an “explorer” mentality can help bridge the gap.
If you’re responsible for launching new ventures within a corporate environment, this piece offers a sharp perspective on what it really takes to break free from bureaucratic inertia. It’s a must-read for those navigating the tension between corporate stability and startup-style growth.
Why you should read it ☝️
Corporate innovation leaders often believe they can mimic startup agility while retaining big-company structure, but the reality is far more complex. This article breaks down the fundamental differences between corporates and startups, highlighting why internal innovation efforts so often fail without structural autonomy.
It’s a must-read for anyone trying to build or fund new ventures inside an enterprise, offering insights into when collaboration works and when it’s a waste of time. If you’re debating whether to incubate, spin out, or invest, this piece provides a clear framework for making the right call.
Why you should read it ☝️
Corporate innovation isn’t failing because companies lack ideas. It’s failing because most innovation efforts are poorly structured, underfunded, or disconnected from real business impact.
This article argues that while traditional corporate innovation models may be dying, new, more effective approaches are emerging. If you’re frustrated by slow-moving internal initiatives, short-term thinking, or constant budget cuts, this piece offers a candid look at why corporate innovation needs a reset. It’s essential reading for anyone looking to build innovation programs that actually drive results, not just check a box.
Want a FREE 🤖?
Refer 3 friends to Innovate, Disrupt, or Die and you can earn a month of free access to either of our unique, highly trained custom GPTs.
*requires a GPT Plus account
This unique AI model serves as the perfect thought partner to guide your general innovation and disruption efforts. Let it become your innovation thought partner.
*requires a GPT Plus account
This GPT will guide you through evaluating your new venture idea across five critical dimensions: Desirability, Feasibility, Viability, Suitability, and Capability.
All you have to do is share your link: {{ rp_refer_url }}
So far, you’ve made {{ rp_num_referrals }} referrals. You’ll earn an awesome gift after {{ rp_num_referrals_until_next_milestone }} more referrals.
